<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Ten Lulu Book Boo Boos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://llbookreview.com/2008/11/top-ten-lulu-book-boo-boos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://llbookreview.com/2008/11/top-ten-lulu-book-boo-boos/</link>
	<description>Self-publishing book review</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:23:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Yarbrough</title>
		<link>http://llbookreview.com/2008/11/top-ten-lulu-book-boo-boos/comment-page-1/#comment-32715</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Yarbrough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lulubookreview.wordpress.com/?p=508#comment-32715</guid>
		<description>Hi Richard-

Thank you for your comment and your explanation.  However, when it comes to self-publishing your book the most important concept most serious authors take into consideration is trying to make your book NOT look like it was self-published.  Therefore, justification of the margin is crucial and a sure sign of amateurism if you don&#039;t do it.  I have never seen a traditionally published book with the jagged right margin and an announcement that said it was done that way to be more pleasing to the eye or for ease of readability.  I know most self-pub&#039;ed authors these days are using that excuse as to the reason why they didn&#039;t justify the margin, but I think the true underlying notion is that they don&#039;t know how to do it.  So, it&#039;s a good excuse, but not good enough if you want your book to be taken seriously by a grander audience outside the self-pub&#039;ed market.

Regards,
Shannon
LLBR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Richard-</p>
<p>Thank you for your comment and your explanation.  However, when it comes to self-publishing your book the most important concept most serious authors take into consideration is trying to make your book NOT look like it was self-published.  Therefore, justification of the margin is crucial and a sure sign of amateurism if you don&#8217;t do it.  I have never seen a traditionally published book with the jagged right margin and an announcement that said it was done that way to be more pleasing to the eye or for ease of readability.  I know most self-pub&#8217;ed authors these days are using that excuse as to the reason why they didn&#8217;t justify the margin, but I think the true underlying notion is that they don&#8217;t know how to do it.  So, it&#8217;s a good excuse, but not good enough if you want your book to be taken seriously by a grander audience outside the self-pub&#8217;ed market.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Shannon<br />
LLBR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Sutton</title>
		<link>http://llbookreview.com/2008/11/top-ten-lulu-book-boo-boos/comment-page-1/#comment-32670</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Sutton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lulubookreview.wordpress.com/?p=508#comment-32670</guid>
		<description>Mr. Yarbrough;
An excellent list for Indie Authors, but there is one bone I must pick. The decision, made by &quot;whom, when&quot;, to justify the right margin of text in books does a terrible disservice to readers. It is a proven fact, through many years of the study of eye movements and fatigue when reading, that justified text creates white space &quot;rivers&quot; and blotches in a block of copy. These tend to confuse the eye and slow down reading as well as accelerate eye strain.

This occurs because, from a typographical standpoint, justified margins create uneven word spacing throughout a line of text. I come from a design background, having worked in that field for almost thirty years, and have always found that rag-right text reads much easier, especially if the designer chooses the proper length of line based upon the character count. Studies have revealed that the eye has the ability to comprehend lines consisting of around 39 characters the best, so the chosen type point size is equally critical for readability, not just to pare down on the printed page numbers, which is more of an issue with publishing over the past few years as paper costs have gone up. The decision to justify book margins is one made with many production reasons other than legibility and readability in mind.

Hope this adds a bit of light on this design area. You, of course, may disagree, but readers should try the test themselves: read several pages of justified text, then try the same read with ragged right margins and see which reads easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Yarbrough;<br />
An excellent list for Indie Authors, but there is one bone I must pick. The decision, made by &#8220;whom, when&#8221;, to justify the right margin of text in books does a terrible disservice to readers. It is a proven fact, through many years of the study of eye movements and fatigue when reading, that justified text creates white space &#8220;rivers&#8221; and blotches in a block of copy. These tend to confuse the eye and slow down reading as well as accelerate eye strain.</p>
<p>This occurs because, from a typographical standpoint, justified margins create uneven word spacing throughout a line of text. I come from a design background, having worked in that field for almost thirty years, and have always found that rag-right text reads much easier, especially if the designer chooses the proper length of line based upon the character count. Studies have revealed that the eye has the ability to comprehend lines consisting of around 39 characters the best, so the chosen type point size is equally critical for readability, not just to pare down on the printed page numbers, which is more of an issue with publishing over the past few years as paper costs have gone up. The decision to justify book margins is one made with many production reasons other than legibility and readability in mind.</p>
<p>Hope this adds a bit of light on this design area. You, of course, may disagree, but readers should try the test themselves: read several pages of justified text, then try the same read with ragged right margins and see which reads easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Yarbrough</title>
		<link>http://llbookreview.com/2008/11/top-ten-lulu-book-boo-boos/comment-page-1/#comment-6532</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Yarbrough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 15:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lulubookreview.wordpress.com/?p=508#comment-6532</guid>
		<description>Hi John-

Good research!  I always say browsing books on the shelf at a store or from your own collection is the best bet when it comes to any type of formatting.  Go see what everyone else is doing and compare.

I personally don&#039;t like &quot;by&quot; on the cover and don&#039;t use it.  I don&#039;t even like it in anthologies of short stories, but I think it&#039;s more appropriate there than on the cover.

As for the size of the title and author name on the cover, I like them to be about the same size on my own books.  However, I am going to make my name larger on my next book.  I don&#039;t really know if that has any effect on sales unless you are someone like James Patterson or Stephen King.

Thanks again for your input.

-Shannon
LLBR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi John-</p>
<p>Good research!  I always say browsing books on the shelf at a store or from your own collection is the best bet when it comes to any type of formatting.  Go see what everyone else is doing and compare.</p>
<p>I personally don&#8217;t like &#8220;by&#8221; on the cover and don&#8217;t use it.  I don&#8217;t even like it in anthologies of short stories, but I think it&#8217;s more appropriate there than on the cover.</p>
<p>As for the size of the title and author name on the cover, I like them to be about the same size on my own books.  However, I am going to make my name larger on my next book.  I don&#8217;t really know if that has any effect on sales unless you are someone like James Patterson or Stephen King.</p>
<p>Thanks again for your input.</p>
<p>-Shannon<br />
LLBR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Howard Reid</title>
		<link>http://llbookreview.com/2008/11/top-ten-lulu-book-boo-boos/comment-page-1/#comment-6524</link>
		<dc:creator>John Howard Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 13:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lulubookreview.wordpress.com/?p=508#comment-6524</guid>
		<description>I was intrigued by the comment that &quot;by&quot; is never ever on a book&#039;s cover. I usually put &quot;by&quot; on the cover, although I occasionally omit it. What are other authors and publishers doing? I went into my local Border&#039;s today and picked up 20 books at random. 16 had no &quot;by&quot; on the cover, but 4 did. 20% is hardly never ever! I also noted that on 6 of the 16 covers with no &quot;by&quot;, the author&#039;s name was printed in extremely small type. This indicated to me that the publisher regarded the author as of very little importance, an impression reinforced by the fact that 5 of the 16 covers rendered the author&#039;s name in much larger type than the title! On the other 5 books, the author&#039;s name was fairly prominent, but still printed in smaller type than the title and, more importantly, in 3 of the 5 cases, the name was placed at the bottom of the cover, either underneath or partly obscured by the artwork.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was intrigued by the comment that &#8220;by&#8221; is never ever on a book&#8217;s cover. I usually put &#8220;by&#8221; on the cover, although I occasionally omit it. What are other authors and publishers doing? I went into my local Border&#8217;s today and picked up 20 books at random. 16 had no &#8220;by&#8221; on the cover, but 4 did. 20% is hardly never ever! I also noted that on 6 of the 16 covers with no &#8220;by&#8221;, the author&#8217;s name was printed in extremely small type. This indicated to me that the publisher regarded the author as of very little importance, an impression reinforced by the fact that 5 of the 16 covers rendered the author&#8217;s name in much larger type than the title! On the other 5 books, the author&#8217;s name was fairly prominent, but still printed in smaller type than the title and, more importantly, in 3 of the 5 cases, the name was placed at the bottom of the cover, either underneath or partly obscured by the artwork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Top Ten Lulu Book Boo Boos -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://llbookreview.com/2008/11/top-ten-lulu-book-boo-boos/comment-page-1/#comment-5651</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Top Ten Lulu Book Boo Boos -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lulubookreview.wordpress.com/?p=508#comment-5651</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Lulu Book Review. Lulu Book Review said: The stakes have been raised! 2 of our reviewers will no longer review books w/ poor formatting. Guidelines here http://tinyurl.com/25996xy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Lulu Book Review. Lulu Book Review said: The stakes have been raised! 2 of our reviewers will no longer review books w/ poor formatting. Guidelines here <a href="http://tinyurl.com/25996xy" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/25996xy</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welcome to Book Synthesis!</title>
		<link>http://llbookreview.com/2008/11/top-ten-lulu-book-boo-boos/comment-page-1/#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>Welcome to Book Synthesis!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lulubookreview.wordpress.com/?p=508#comment-2754</guid>
		<description>[...] November 2008, we posted a list of &#8220;book boo boos&#8221; that we commonly see in self-published books.  To this day, we still see a number of mistakes and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] November 2008, we posted a list of &#8220;book boo boos&#8221; that we commonly see in self-published books.  To this day, we still see a number of mistakes and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon Yarbrough</title>
		<link>http://llbookreview.com/2008/11/top-ten-lulu-book-boo-boos/comment-page-1/#comment-2352</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Yarbrough</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 14:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lulubookreview.wordpress.com/?p=508#comment-2352</guid>
		<description>Hi DED-

It&#039;s okay.  We still see a ton a manuscripts that don&#039;t justify their right margin. You can still post a query for a review.

Thanks,
Shannon
LLBR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi DED-</p>
<p>It&#8217;s okay.  We still see a ton a manuscripts that don&#8217;t justify their right margin. You can still post a query for a review.</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Shannon<br />
LLBR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DED</title>
		<link>http://llbookreview.com/2008/11/top-ten-lulu-book-boo-boos/comment-page-1/#comment-2349</link>
		<dc:creator>DED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lulubookreview.wordpress.com/?p=508#comment-2349</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I didn&#039;t take #8 (right margin justification) into account. Too worried about hyphenated words wrapping wrong and weird justified paragraphs. Should I not bother submitting? All the other points are covered. I even hired a professional editor to proofread the manuscript.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I didn&#8217;t take #8 (right margin justification) into account. Too worried about hyphenated words wrapping wrong and weird justified paragraphs. Should I not bother submitting? All the other points are covered. I even hired a professional editor to proofread the manuscript.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Lane</title>
		<link>http://llbookreview.com/2008/11/top-ten-lulu-book-boo-boos/comment-page-1/#comment-978</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lulubookreview.wordpress.com/?p=508#comment-978</guid>
		<description>Something else that makes me avoid certain books have &quot;by&quot; next to the author&#039;s name.  It reminds me of a school report or somebody that just hasn&#039;t read that many books to realize that &quot;by&quot; is never ever on the cover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something else that makes me avoid certain books have &#8220;by&#8221; next to the author&#8217;s name.  It reminds me of a school report or somebody that just hasn&#8217;t read that many books to realize that &#8220;by&#8221; is never ever on the cover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Authors Give Us Your Previews</title>
		<link>http://llbookreview.com/2008/11/top-ten-lulu-book-boo-boos/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Authors Give Us Your Previews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 23:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lulubookreview.wordpress.com/?p=508#comment-911</guid>
		<description>[...] their cup of tea, why not allow them the same facility online. Remember, as stated in our Top Ten Lulu Book Boo Boos article, &#8220;No preview at all is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their cup of tea, why not allow them the same facility online. Remember, as stated in our Top Ten Lulu Book Boo Boos article, &#8220;No preview at all is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

