No responses to “Review 2: Intriguing Entrekin”

  1. Will Entrekin

    Wow. Thank you for the truly excellent review. I’m thrilled to find you liked it so much, and appreciate your notes on the individual pieces. Interesting comments on “This Ain’t Wonderland,” and certainly something for me to bear in mind.

    I also wanted to note that I’m no longer on MySpace, nor even have a profile there. I did, however, take up blogging at blog.willentrekin.com, for anyone interested.

    Once again, thank you for allowing me to be part of your launching this exciting new venture.

    -Sorry for the mention of MySpace, but thank you for bringing your new blog to our attention. -LLBR

  2. Bunnygirl

    I haven’t read the book, but what intrigues me is that it sounds like the sort of collection one would never find in traditional publishing. A major publishing house would consider a collection of fiction, non-fiction and poetry unmarketable and not worth their time, unless it was by someone uber-famous.

    IMHO, this is the real value POD brings to literature– the ability of the author to create what they want to create and to hell with what the publisher thinks is most likely to make a buck. There will naturally be a lot of hit or miss, but there are also opportunities for writers to experiment and maybe re-define the literary landscape. Or just have fun. :-)

    Bunny-
    You are absolutely right. Will just so happens to mention Stephen King’s The Night Shift twice in this book which is a great single author anthology. I think the day of the single author anthologies is just about over though. Back in the day of Southern Lit’s peak, authors like Flannery O’Connor and Truman Capote had some of their best work featured in their own anthologies. Today, it seems collected works are best saved for when an author is long gone. I, myself, have been published in a few multi-author anthologies, which are very popular. Readers still embrace the short story genre. I’m a fan of them myself which is why I chose to review Will’s work. I like reading a few stories at one setting and having closure. I don’t feel as bad if I have to put the book down for a few days, and I haven’t missed out on anything. When I pick it up again, it’s a fresh start. -LLBR

  3. Alma

    I read Will’s blog when he was on MySpace, and I know self-publishing was something he struggled with. It’s something he got attacked for pretty regularly afterwards. He published his work this way because he didn’t think there was a market for his short stories and poetry. Will is an excellent writer, but sadly, he doesn’t fit under the thumb of traditional, “literary” markets. I’m a writer who does fit under that category and have had some success–but so what? The problem with publishing is that a lot of non-traditional talent is easily overlooked, and others are only read by other writers. Surely, there’s a better system where all writers can have the freedom to write and be read. Maybe, it’s POD.

    Alma-
    Thanks for your insight. However, I don’t think it’s sad that Will doesn’t fit under the thumb of traditional markets, as you say. I don’t even think I agree with that statement. I think Will is ahead of the market today. Too many people are still oohing and ahhing over the Secret and Harry Potter. Right now, Will just lacks a paying audience. Walk into any bookstore today and what do you see? Brown, Grisham, King, Steel, Rowling….do we buy those books because honestly they are good writing? Or do we buy them because everyone else is reading the same damn thing and we want to be part of the in crowd?

    I’m proud to say I haven’t read one single Harry Potter book, and I never will. They don’t interest me. I’m happy that authors like Rowling have a story to tell that amazingly appeals to the masses, makes the author filthy rich, so they can then do what? Stop writing about what got them there in the first place. There is a breaking point in a writer’s life (notice I said writer, not author), an epiphany when we stop thinking about the dollar and we write solely because it is in our blood and we have to do it. We write to fulfill those needs. We write for ourselves. We write to be heard. And Will has proudly reached that point. If he had not, would we be here now discussing him?

    I’m not trying to offend you in the least bit; bravo to you for being publishing traditionally, but sometimes “traditional” is boring. An author writes what his agents and editors tell him will sell. Does it end up on the shelf as the story he honestly wanted to tell? Probably not. But he doesn’t care, because his six figure royalty check cleared. Believe me, I’d love a six figure royalty check myself, but some writers choose POD because they believe in the story they need to tell, not in the story an editor bends his writing into. POD is the best option sometimes for that writer, and it may or may not get him a paycheck. But in the end, a true writer won’t care because he came by his book honestly and whole heartedly.

    -LLBR

  4. Alma

    Re: LLBR’s response to my comment

    I’m not offended in the least. I totally agree with everything you’ve said, and I do believe traditional publishers are going to have to bend if they’re going to be successful. When I said I was sad, I wasn’t saying I was sad for Will. I’m sad for publishing because it means good writers are overlooked for superficial reasons. My point, I think, is that despite my marginal success in being published in traditional markets, I don’t see any real value in these pursuits. (Hence, my “so what?”). As a short story writer/poet, you’re usually relegated to small literary ‘zines that no one ever reads–unless they’re trying to get in them. Most of the ‘zines that published my early work don’t even exist anymore. I think any serious writer has to think about that. Will, I think, is one of the first to pioneer a new way of doing things. The other thing that makes me sad is how much he has been attacked for it, and how–in some ways–it may prevent him from finding a publisher for his novel. For me, POD is a viable option–nothing to be stigmatized–but stodgy idiots continue to marginalize it. Unfortunately, some of those stodgy idiots actually hold power in publishing. Something has to change, certainly.

  5. bunnygirl

    What I find puzzling is why anyone would criticize someone for going POD with a book that is obviously not the sort that would get picked up by a traditional publisher. Seeking publication of a hybrid fiction/nonfiction/poetry collection would be time-consuming with very little chance of success, regardless of the quality of the writing. All that time soliciting rejection notices could be much better spent writing new stuff.

    I spent some time on the query-go-round with a novel that does have potential to get picked up by a publishing house. It was a big time-suck, and since I have a full time job and other life commitments, actively querying means no time for writing. Every agent wants something slightly different and you can’t just put together one package and send it out to all of them. It’s therefore of little benefit to play the query game with something offbeat unless one is unemployed or in a writing drought.

    Now I only bother trying to sell the novels and stories that fit the marketers’ mold. My other stuff gets posted on one of my blogs and/or goes POD. It keeps me in that creative space that makes me happy, and it’s not like I write for money. As I said before, I already have a job.

    I hope the hostility to POD will diminish over time. I think it has to. Right now I have a friend who is trying to get a novel published in the traditional way while pre-building a fan base for it on her blog. I’ve suggested she put together a POD book of related stories about her characters to help keep her fans enticed but she’s been advised by traditionally published writers not to go that route. Maybe their advice is correct. If so, I’m screwed because my two POD books are tie-ins to the novel I send out queries for when time permits. I can’t help thinking it’s an odd prejudice, though. Why should it matter if you blog or POD the stuff you won’t be seeking an agent for?

  6. shannonyarbrough

    UPDATE: Will is now offering Entrekin as a free download to celebrate his work’s year long journey. Check it out!

    http://blog.willentrekin.com/2008/03/01/entrekin-a-year-in-review/#comment-54

Leave a Reply